Getting custody would mean proving him to be unfit. It does not sound as though he is. Mean and cold-hearted, but not unfit.
The law is that a step-parent has a right to step-parent visitation if the judge determines it to be in the best interests of the minor. It sounds as though the two children you have jointly with your former husband are with you, it would for sure be in her best interest to visit with her siblings.
Not every judge or mediator knows about step-parent visitation. Ask the judge or mediator hearing your case to look at Family Code Section 3100(a).
The law requires that a parent (who does not have custody) be given visitation unless it would be detrimental to the child.
The court may order visitation for "any other person with an interest in the welfare of the child" if it would be in the child's best interests.
There are some United States Supreme Court cases that say that the right to raise one's own children without the interference of the government is a protected right and that suggest that any order requiring visitation with a non-parent over the objection of the parents might be unconstitutional.
So the law passed by the California Legislature gives the judge very wide authority, but the US Constitution may limit that authority.
All you can do is to make your request and see what happens. You do have another issue and that is whether your request belongs in California or it belongs in the court of the state where the child lives.
For sure, it does not belong in your divorce case. It actually belongs in the divorce case of your husband and the mother of his child.
You have to butt into that case (there is a technical term for it; it is actually called being "joined" to the other case but butt in is more descriptive of what is actually happening) and use it as the forum for asking for visitation rights. Good luck with this.
Answered on Aug 13th, 2012 at 3:23 PM