There is insufficient information to frame a meaningful answer - much depends on the exiting orders: who has been directed to do, say, or provide what to whom. The Nevada Supreme Court gave better guidance in 2009 of the meaning of joint legal custody - including the duty to provide information - in the Rivero case. That opinion is posted publicly online with a lot of other information. To answer the last question, you can try to discuss things, send a letter threatening what you will do if she does not provide what you want, or file a motion, seeking either specific performance of some tasks, or such custodial changes as you feel are required or necessary.
Answered on Jun 07th, 2011 at 1:26 PM